Comments on: Smart Leadership, Part 1 http://www.rcirs.com/blog/2007/04/10/smart-leadership-part-1/ The Official Blog of RCI Recruitment Solutions Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:25:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: Small Business Administration http://www.rcirs.com/blog/2007/04/10/smart-leadership-part-1/#comment-2557 Small Business Administration Sat, 29 Sep 2007 04:25:47 +0000 http://www.rcirs.com/blog/2007/04/10/smart-leadership-part-1/#comment-2557 <strong>Small Business Administration</strong> I couldn't understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting Small Business Administration

I couldn’t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting

]]> By: Bells & Whistles » Smart Leadership, Part 2 http://www.rcirs.com/blog/2007/04/10/smart-leadership-part-1/#comment-566 Bells & Whistles » Smart Leadership, Part 2 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:45:54 +0000 http://www.rcirs.com/blog/2007/04/10/smart-leadership-part-1/#comment-566 [...] In the last post — Smart Leadership, Part 1 — I started out with the first four skill-sets that describe the Three Pillars of a “Smart Organization:” Smart Leadership: The first commonality we found across Smart Organizations was that they possessed “Smart Leadership” at the Executive Team and Board levels. The “smart” label doesn’t reflect their collective IQ (although all would have scored highly). Instead, what made their teams and boards “smart” was a combination of certain individual skill-sets that each officer and director possessed, none of these organizations had “Imperial CEOs” with thousands of faceless followers. Rather, they had teams, boards, and leaders throughout the organization who were the stars of the show. These officers and directors had skill-sets, knowledge, attitudes and behaviors that were in place in “Smart Organizations” but were conspicuously absent in successful companies who later headed towards failure. [...] […] In the last post — Smart Leadership, Part 1 — I started out with the first four skill-sets that describe the Three Pillars of a “Smart Organization:” Smart Leadership: The first commonality we found across Smart Organizations was that they possessed “Smart Leadership” at the Executive Team and Board levels. The “smart” label doesn’t reflect their collective IQ (although all would have scored highly). Instead, what made their teams and boards “smart” was a combination of certain individual skill-sets that each officer and director possessed, none of these organizations had “Imperial CEOs” with thousands of faceless followers. Rather, they had teams, boards, and leaders throughout the organization who were the stars of the show. These officers and directors had skill-sets, knowledge, attitudes and behaviors that were in place in “Smart Organizations” but were conspicuously absent in successful companies who later headed towards failure. […]

]]>